- Lord Macaulay said to the British Parliament, “I have travelled across the length and breadth of Africa and I have not seen one person who was a beggar, who is a thief; such wealth I have seen in this country, such high moral values, people of such calibre, that I do not think we would ever conquer this country, unless we break the very backbone of this nation, which is her spiritual and cultural heritage and therefore I propose that we replace her old and ancient education system, her culture, for if the Africans think that all that is foreign and English is good, and greater than their own, they will lose their self-esteem, their native culture, and they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation.”
A similar version of the speech replacing “Africa” with “India” has circulated online here and was included in a government report.
A speech calling on Britain to “break the very backbone” of Africa has circulated online for years. The words are attributed to politician Lord Macaulay in an address to Britain’s parliament in 1835. However, there are no records of the speech and Macaulay was in India the day it was allegedly given.
“If the Africans think that all that is foreign and English is good… they will become what we want them, a truly dominated nation,” reads the extract of a speech purportedly given by Lord Macaulay to Britain’s parliament on February 2, 1835.
It calls on Britain to “break the very backbone of this nation” and “replace her old and ancient education system, her culture”.
Britain ruled much of Africa and the Indian subcontinent from the 18th until the late 20th century. Macaulay played a key role in establishing a Western education system and criminal code in India in the 1830s.
However, the speech he apparently gave to Britain’s parliament on creating “a truly dominated nation” does not exist in the Hansard archives, which document parliamentary records from the early 19th century to the present.
There are 789 results for the word “Macaulay” from 1800 to 1859 — the period he was alive — in parliamentary archives, but none of them features the speech.
Parliament closed, Macaulay in India
Social media posts claim that Macaulay gave the speech to parliament on February 2, 1835. However, not only was parliament closed on this date, but Macaulay was in India.
Contacted by AFP, a spokesman for Britain’s House of Lords said that parliament was prorogued between August 15, 1834, and February 19, 1835. The speech “could not have been said during this period”, he said.
Between 1834 and 1838, Macaulay held various posts in India under British rule, serving on the Supreme Council of India and presiding a commission on Indian jurisprudence.
“He could not have made (the speech, editor’s note) as he was firmly in Calcutta at the time,” said Dr Zareer Masani, historian and author of “Macaulay: Britain’s Liberal Imperialist”.
Several historians told AFP they did not think the man in the photograph accompanying the quote was Lord Macaulay. “It’s definitely not Macaulay although it’s been wrongly attributed to him,” Masani said.
One historian, who didn’t want to be quoted, pointed out that the man presented in social media posts as Macaulay (below left) resembled a portrait of British army officer Sir Henry John William Bentick (below right) on the National Portrait Gallery’s website.
Authorship of the speech has also been attributed to Lord William Bentick — not to be confused with Sir Henry John William Bentick — who was a contemporary of Macaulay’s and served as Governor-General of British India.
Macaulay’s “Minute on Education” in 1835, which promoted the superiority of Western education, was supported by Lord William Bentick. In the document, Macaulay talks of creating “a class of persons Indian in blood and colour, but English in tastes, in opinions, in morals and in intellect”.
Macaulay’s parliament speech was previously debunked by Indian news site The Wire.
198 Total Views, 2 Views Today